UPA made Indira’s draconian FCRA tougher, Modi govt’s amendments will now make it worse


Minister of State for Home Affairs Nityanand Rai introduces the FCRA amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha Sunday | Photo: ANI


Text Size:

New Delhi: Former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi introduced the draconian Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) in 1976, the UPA government made it much tougher in 2010 and now, the Narendra Modi government seeks to tighten whatever few loopholes or breathing spaces were left in the law, ThePrint’s Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta said in episode 572 of ‘Cut The Clutter’.

The FCRA was passed by Indira Gandhi at the peak of Emergency. Her purpose was first to make sure that rival political parties could not receive money from overseas. It was draconian, xenophobic and rested on the theory of the ‘foreign hand’.

Gandhi was paranoid that people like politician George Fernandes were well linked to international socialists, including Willy Brandt, German leaders and European socialists.

“But wherever the government wanted to look the other way, it did look the other way,” added Gupta. For example, pro-CPI individuals continued getting their money from North Korea or Soviet Union and those weren’t classified as donations but rather ‘supplements’.

The original law also sought to block foreign contributions to editors, correspondents, columnists, printers, publishers and most importantly, cartoonists. “I think she [Indira Gandhi] was so hurt by what Abu Abraham and RK Laxman were doing to her, that she specifically included cartoonists,” added Gupta.

In 2010, the UPA government tightened the FCRA, and now the Congress is criticising the Modi government for seeking to further tighten the same law. “In our country, if a bad law is passed, nobody changes it. In fact, nobody changes it for the better. Every subsequent guy usually changes it for the worse,” Gupta said.


Also read: Modi govt tables FCRA amendments, opposition & NGOs call it fatal blow to civil society work


Modi government’s amendments

First, the Modi government seeks to tighten the FCRA’s definition of “public servant” under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Now, any politician, media personnel, legislator from receiving any foreign funding by way of donations.

The proposed amendments does not allow one to receive foreign contributions unless they seek clearance from the Government of India or apply for an FCRA licence. The original law had allowed FCRA licences to be permanent but the UPA government restricted it to five years. “That is why in 2015, more than 10,000 NGOs suddenly lost their FCRA licence and had to apply again,” said Gupta.

Second, the original law allowed foreign contributions to be spent as desired but the 2010 amendment said only 50 per cent of the amount could be spent on administrative expenses. The BJP government now wants to reduce that to 20 per cent. It will also now demand the Aadhaar numbers of all directors, CEOs and key employees of NGOs, which receive money from overseas for their FCRA licences.

Third, the UPA government’s version of the bill said if the Government of India has doubts about an NGO, it can suspend its functioning for 180 days. The Modi government wishes to extend that period by another 180 days i.e. an entire year — something that Congress has now objected to.

Next, the proposed amendments seek to stop NGOs with FCRA licences from transferring extra money in their account to other NGOs with licences. Also, any interest accrued on top of contributions will be subject to FCRA rules and restrictions.

The BJP’s basic argument is that FCRA contributions have doubled in the last 10 years, and that the data suggests a lot of people are misusing it, explained Gupta.


Also read: Govt cancelled FCRA registration of 1,807 NGOs in 2019 for violating laws


What the BJP isn’t changing in FCRA

In 2010, the UPA expanded the FCRA’s definition of political parties to include all organisations of political nature like trade unions, farmers’ organisations, workers, youth forums etc. The Modi government doesn’t seek to change this.

What’s also interesting to note is that in 2014, the Delhi High Court found political parties, including the BJP and the Congress, guilty of receiving foreign contributions. Therefore, the BJP amended the FCRA by burying a tiny amendment in its 2016 Finance Bill that made it easier for parties to accept foreign funds.

In 2018, the government amended it further to do away with the scope for scrutiny of political parties’ funding since 1976, which equally provided relief to both the BJP and the Congress.

Thus, in this way, everyone is complicit in this case of political parties receiving funds from abroad, according to Gupta.

“So, any law is only as good as the powers implementing it and their intentions,” concluded Gupta.

Watch the latest episode of CTC here:

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future.

Support Our Journalism